How to write a review of literature.
· What is a review of literature?
The format of a review of literature may vary from discipline to
discipline and from assignment to assignment.
A review may be a self-contained unit -- an end in itself -- or
a preface to and rationale for engaging in primary research. A review is a
required part of grant and research proposals and often a chapter in theses and
dissertations.
Generally, the purpose of a review is to analyze critically a
segment of a published body of knowledge through summary, classification, and
comparison of prior research studies, reviews of literature, and theoretical
articles.
In the introduction, you should:
·
Define or identify the general topic, issue, or area of concern,
thus providing an appropriate context for reviewing the literature.
·
Point out overall trends in what has been published about the
topic; or conflicts in theory, methodology, evidence, and conclusions; or gaps
in research and scholarship; or a single problem or new perspective of
immediate interest.
·
Establish the writer's reason (point of view) for reviewing the
literature; explain the criteria to be used in analyzing and comparing
literature and the organization of the review (sequence); and, when necessary,
state why certain literature is or is not included (scope).
In the body, you should:
·
Group research studies and other types of literature (reviews,
theoretical articles, case studies, etc.) according to common denominators such
as qualitative versus quantitative approaches, conclusions of authors, specific
purpose or objective, chronology, etc.
·
Summarize individual studies or articles with as much or as
little detail as each merits according to its comparative importance in the
literature, remembering that space (length) denotes significance.
·
Provide the reader with strong "umbrella" sentences at
beginnings of paragraphs, "signposts" throughout, and brief "so
what" summary sentences at intermediate points in the review to aid in
understanding comparisons and analyses.
In the conclusion, you should:
·
Summarize major contributions of significant studies and
articles to the body of knowledge under review, maintaining the focus
established in the introduction.
·
Evaluate the current "state of the art" for the body
of knowledge reviewed, pointing out major methodological flaws or gaps in
research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues pertinent
to future study.
·
Conclude by providing some insight into the relationship between
the central topic of the literature review and a larger area of study such as a
discipline, a scientific endeavor, or a profession.
No comments:
Post a Comment