Foreign Market
Entry Modes
The decision of how to enter a foreign market can
have a significant impact on the results. Expansion into foreign markets can be
achieved via the following four mechanisms:
- Exporting
- Licensing
- Joint Venture
- Direct Investment
Exporting
Exporting is the marketing and direct sale of
domestically-produced goods in another country. Exporting is a traditional and
well-established method of reaching foreign markets. Since exporting does not
require that the goods be produced in the target country, no investment in
foreign production facilities is required. Most of the costs associated with
exporting take the form of marketing expenses.
Exporting commonly requires coordination among
four players:
- Exporter
- Importer
- Transport provider
- Government
Licensing
Licensing essentially permits a company in the
target country to use the property of the licensor. Such property usually is
intangible, such as trademarks, patents, and production techniques. The
licensee pays a fee in exchange for the rights to use the intangible property
and possibly for technical assistance.
Because little investment on the part of the
licensor is required, licensing has the potential to provide a very large ROI.
However, because the licensee produces and markets the product, potential
returns from manufacturing and marketing activities may be lost.
Joint Venture
There are five common objectives in a joint venture:
market entry, risk/reward sharing, technology sharing and joint product
development, and conforming to government regulations. Other benefits include
political connections and distribution channel access that may depend on
relationships.
Such alliances often are favorable when:
·
the partners' strategic goals converge while
their competitive goals diverge;
·
the partners' size, market power, and resources
are small compared to the industry leaders; and
·
partners' are able to learn from one another
while limiting access to their own proprietary skills.
The key issues to consider in a joint venture are
ownership, control, length of agreement, pricing, technology transfer, local
firm capabilities and resources, and government intentions.
Potential problems include:
- conflict over asymmetric new investments
- mistrust over proprietary knowledge
- performance ambiguity - how to split the pie
- lack of parent firm support
- cultural clashes
- if, how, and when to terminate the relationship
Joint ventures have conflicting pressures to
cooperate and compete:
·
Strategic imperative: the partners want to
maximize the advantage gained for the joint venture, but they also want to
maximize their own competitive position.
·
The joint venture attempts to develop shared
resources, but each firm wants to develop and protect its own proprietary
resources.
·
The joint venture is controlled through
negotiations and coordination processes, while each firm would like to have
hierarchical control.
Foreign Direct Investment
Foreign direct investment (FDI) is the direct
ownership of facilities in the target country. It involves the transfer of
resources including capital, technology, and personnel. Direct foreign
investment may be made through the acquisition of an existing entity or the
establishment of a new enterprise.
Direct ownership provides a high degree of
control in the operations and the ability to better know the consumers and
competitive environment. However, it requires a high level of resources and a
high degree of commitment.
The Case of EuroDisney
Different modes of entry may be more appropriate
under different circumstances, and the mode of entry is an important factor in
the success of the project. Walt Disney Co. faced the challenge of building a theme
park in Europe. Disney's mode of entry in Japan had been licensing. However,
the firm chose direct investment in its European theme park, owning 49% with
the remaining 51% held publicly.
Besides the mode of entry, another important
element in Disney's decision was exactly where in Europe to locate. There are
many factors in the site selection decision, and a company carefully must
define and evaluate the criteria for choosing a location. The problems with the
EuroDisney project illustrate that even if a company has been successful in the
past, as Disney had been with its California, Florida, and Tokyo theme parks,
future success is not guaranteed, especially when moving into a different
country and culture. The appropriate adjustments for national differences
always should be made.
Comparision of Market Entry Options
The following table provides a summary of the
possible modes of foreign market entry:
Comparison of Foreign Market
Entry Modes
Mode
|
Conditions Favoring this Mode
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
Exporting
|
Limited sales
potential in target country; little product adaptation required
Distribution
channels close to plants
High target
country production costs
Liberal import
policies
High political
risk
|
Minimizes risk and
investment.
Speed of entry
Maximizes scale;
uses existing facilities.
|
Trade barriers &
tariffs add to costs.
Transport costs
Limits access to
local information
Company viewed
as an outsider
|
Licensing
|
Import and investment
barriers
Legal protection
possible in target environment.
Low sales
potential in target country.
Large cultural
distance
Licensee lacks
ability to become a competitor.
|
Minimizes risk and
investment.
Speed of entry
Able to circumvent
trade barriers
High ROI
|
Lack of control over
use of assets.
Licensee may
become competitor.
Knowledge
spillovers
License period
is limited
|
Joint Ventures
|
Import barriers
Large cultural
distance
Assets cannot be
fairly priced
High sales
potential
Some political
risk
Government
restrictions on foreign ownership
Local company
can provide skills, resources, distribution network, brand name, etc.
|
Overcomes ownership
restrictions and cultural distance
Combines
resources of 2 companies.
Potential for
learning
Viewed as
insider
Less investment
required
|
Difficult to manage
Dilution of
control
Greater risk
than exporting a & licensing
Knowledge
spillovers
Partner may
become a competitor.
|
Direct Investment
|
Import barriers
Small cultural
distance
Assets cannot be
fairly priced
High sales
potential
Low political
risk
|
Greater knowledge of
local market
Can better apply
specialized skills
Minimizes
knowledge spillover
Can be viewed as
an insider
|
Higher risk than
other modes
Requires more
resources and commitment
May be difficult
to manage the local resources.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment